Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TFA Protector Bot: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
+
Discussion: Comment
Line 48:
 
I decided it was pointless to re-instate any move=autoconfirmed protection since non-autoconfirmed users can't move pages.
--—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 03:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)--—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 03:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)''''Italic text''''''Italic text''''''Italic text''''''Italic text''''''''''--—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 03:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)--—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 03:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)--—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 03:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)--—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 03:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)===Discussion===
===Discussion===
<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion -->
{{ping|Bencherlite}} [[User:Legoktm|Legoktm]] ([[User talk:Legoktm|talk]]) 17:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Line 57:
*If we're having a bot do this, is it also worth having the bot fully protect all templates used in TFA? It's been less of a problem recently, but we used to get quite a bit of that sort of vandalism (e.g. penis appears floating on TFA, but editing that page will not remove it and someone has to check all unprotected/semi-protected transcluded templates). <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:WJBscribe|WJBscribe]] [[User talk:WJBscribe|(talk)]]</strong> 22:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
*:Alternatively, [[WP:FAP]] could be revived, cascade protected and the bot could transclude all the templates from TFA onto that page, instead of protecting each template. <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:WJBscribe|WJBscribe]] [[User talk:WJBscribe|(talk)]]</strong> 22:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
*I'm hopeless at python, and I still am not used to legoktm being highlighted blue now. but I don't see any issues with this bot.—[[User:C678|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberpower]] [[User talk:C678|<sup style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Chat]]<sub style="margin-left:-4.4ex;color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 03:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)