Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 1 thread from Template talk:Sidebar. (ARCHIVE FULL) |
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 1 thread from Template talk:Sidebar. (ARCHIVE FULL) |
||
Line 894:
:::: As regards style/bodystyle, then, I'm not sure what point you're making – apologies if I'm missing something obvious.
:::: [[User:CsDix|CsDix]] ([[User talk:CsDix|talk]]) 04:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
== Edit request on 24 February 2013 ==
{{edit protected|answered=yes}}
<!-- Begin request -->
Hello. I noticed that a means to specify the class for any particular heading and content section (e.g. in order to switch, temporarily, from hlist to plainlist) hasn't yet been implemented, so [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Sidebar/sandbox&oldid=540010153 this] version of the template in the sandbox should now provide this possibility (look for <nowiki>{{{headingNclass}}}es and {{{contentNclass}}}es</nowiki>). If all looks okay, please make it the live version.
<!-- End request -->
[[User:CsDix|CsDix]] ([[User talk:CsDix|talk]]) 05:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
: Adding even more customisation here rather belies the point of standardising it in the first place (one key reason for doing so was to attempt to increase the overall consistency of different sidebars). Is there a specific case where there is a consensus that this is necessary? [[User:Thumperward|Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward)]] ([[User talk:Thumperward|talk]]) 12:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
:: I fear you may be missing the point (hint: the parenthesis). Thanks, though, for your attention. [[User:CsDix|CsDix]] ([[User talk:CsDix|talk]]) 18:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
::: Again, is there a concrete example here? Do we really want to have a mix of different list types in a single sidebar? Please don't continue to re-enable editprotected requests while they're disputed. [[User:Thumperward|Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward)]] ([[User talk:Thumperward|talk]]) 10:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
:::: [[Template:Thermodynamics]], were it to be converted to use semantic lists while preserving the current format, would. However, I'm not sure whether I would support this request. It does seem to me that we're losing the opportunity for microformats (which I'm not sure we want in a sidebar). That said, I think this request would add more complexity than is worthwhile, and so I think on the few cases where we might want to do it, we can just change the classes ourselves. Just musing here. --[[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 17:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
:::: Never mind. As Izno indicates, it's something that can be done manually (i.e. less elegantly) anyway. Don't see why a mix would be a problem and the circumstance I had in mind was an hlist of links each of whose length meant they were rendered one per line, i.e. as if a plainlist. Just thought it was an oversight worth correcting, but I guess not. [[User:CsDix|CsDix]] ([[User talk:CsDix|talk]]) 00:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
| |||