Fifth-generation programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:12, 20 April 2013

Revision as of 03:18, 5 June 2013

Line 9:

However, as larger programs were built, the flaws of the approach became more apparent. It turns out that starting from a set of constraints defining a particular problem, deriving an efficient algorithm to solve it is a very difficult problem in itself. This crucial step cannot yet be automated and still requires the insight of a human programmer.

Today,{{when|date=January 2013}} fifth-generation languages are back as a possible level of computer language. A number{{Who|date=August 2010}} of software vendors currently claim that their software meets the visual "programming" requirements of the 5GL concept.

==Common misconception==