Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:15, 19 June 2013

Revision as of 02:15, 19 June 2013

Line 64:

*'''Delete''' Classic [[WP:GNG]] fail. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Keep arguments are classic fallacious arguments as has already been pointed out, [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 23:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' Whether it is justified or not, I do not think people are aware realize how much they appear to have an axe to grind with marking this article for deletion. If there's a page on [[SantaCon]], what harm is there in having one on this conference? This conference will be of clear interest to anyone researching the topic of cold fusion, whether they find its claims convincing or compete pseudoscience.