Talk:Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:25, 9 April 2013

Revision as of 12:10, 1 July 2013

Line 166:

As a longtime user of FLP, I can also safely say that there isn't much of a difference between the application support on a standard Windows XP machine as there is on WinFLP. you just need to add in the few files Microsoft took out (I.E. Null.sys, mspaint.exe, joy.cpl to name a few) and you should be alright. These can be, as has been explained in the SP3 discussion topic above, found mostly in the i386 folder in the mentioned directory after the SP3 install. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.81.245.197|68.81.245.197]] ([[User talk:68.81.245.197|talk]]) 06:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Alternative "Software Remastering" methods: nLite ==

[[nLite]] should be mentioned in the article as an alternative for FLP. It can be used to decrease the size and memory requirements of any NT 5 family OS, including XP, deploying images containing only the needed features, and potentially achieving more compact systems than FLP if using Windows 2000 as the base, which does not contain as many UI graphics, such as icons, that cannot be fully unloaded from memory. -- [[User:J7n|J7n]] ([[User talk:J7n|talk]]) 12:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)