Talk:One-way function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Reverted to revision 549907559 by 198.160.96.7: incoherent. (TW)
Line 187:
 
It's very hard to understand... I get the general sense from this section that there exists a function that if proved to be one way, would prove that functions can be one way. But it doesn't explain much else... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.117.26.39|69.117.26.39]] ([[User talk:69.117.26.39|talk]]) 00:33, 20 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Matrix Based Hypothesis for One Way function ==
 
One Way Functions Hypothesis
 
One way meaning supposedly traumatic if reversed?
 
Perhaps
 
If X = Positive ; for successful input of course
 
coding
 
X ^(1/ 2x,4x,8x,16x,32x)
 
Etc, Sends only one way, isolates and becomes wholesome easily with tree diagram fractionally and decimally.
 
 
 
If X = Negative
 
X ^ ( 1/ 7 x) ^ (1/11x) ^ (1/13x) ^ (1/17x)
 
etc repeating to induce irrational exponentationonal yields to overload the base 10 decimal system.
 
X = x or any other variable
 
 
 
In math
 
If X is + ; multiply Matrix [ 1/(2x)^x]
If X is - ; multiply Matrix [ 1/ (yx)^x]
 
y = [Set of Primes >7]
 
 
Brackets = [ 1 x (X)] Matrix
 
Or simply to deny a function
 
take |x|
 
if X if positive, program yields
 
if X is negative, program denies
 
 
-Seamus Reemus