Talk:Java performance: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 263:
 
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- [[User:Khazar2|Khazar2]] ([[User talk:Khazar2|talk]]) 18:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 
== Citations saying JNI is slow are very old ==
 
One of them is explicitly from 2001, and the other had no explicit date I could find but mentioned some of its tests as being performed under Windows 98.
 
These citations do not give me confidence that this is still the case, and I would recommend the section be updated, or at least that a <nowiki>{{Update|inaccurate=yes}}</nowiki> tag be added to the section.