Content deleted Content added
Chimed in my own opinion |
|||
Line 17:
:Of course Python does not attempt to be a "pure-functional language" i.e. a language which requires programmers to use functional constructs. Nevertheless, it still permits the style in the large, by (for instance) permitting functions as values, generators, [http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~duchier/python/continuations.html continuations], etc. --[[User:Fubar Obfusco|FOo]]
:"List comprehensions" may be more Pythonic, but how are they more readable? I find map, filter, and co. to be extremely readable and intuitive, much more so than the new list comprehensions. Unfortunately, GvR doesn't agree with me on that...
-------
I do not think Python is 'strongly influenced' by Perl. In fact the design philosophy is diametrically opposite in some senses.[[talk:pasokan|pasokan]]
| |||