Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 12: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 1 thread from Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace. |
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads from Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace. |
||
Line 2,218:
The text "''This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution.''" is rather contradictory: It is stating that you are breaking the law, yet that action is merely undesired. Can that be changed to "unacceptable" or "inappropriate" or ''something else'' to be a better choice of wording? Rgrds. --[[Special:Contributions/64.85.216.200|64.85.216.200]] ([[User talk:64.85.216.200|talk]]) 05:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
== Template:Uw-spam1-bot/default ==
I saw the spam1 bot default, I feel like i should update it to match the bot warnings of the future, today!
{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]]}}} Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, atleast one or more of the [[Wikipedia:External links|external links]] you added {{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|to the page[[:{{{1}}}]]}} do not comply with our [[Wikipedia:External links|guidelines for external links]] and have been removed.
* [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#LINK|Wikipedia is not a collection of links]]; nor should it be used as a platform for[[Wikipedia:Spam|advertising]] or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project.
* Because Wikipedia uses [[nofollow]] tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings.
*If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the {{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|[[{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}TALKPAGENAME:{{{1}}}}}|article's talk page]]|article's talk page}} before reinserting it.
Please take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<includeonly>{{{category|[[Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam1 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}}</includeonly>{{z88}}<!-- Template:uw-spam1 --><noinclude>
Think this one is better. [[User:DDreth|<font color="blue">DD</font><font color="green">reth</font>]] [[User talk:DDreth|<font color="black">ask me questions!</font>]] 19:46, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
== Uw-cia series and Uw-talkinarticle redundant ==
I noticed that we have multiple templates for users who talk on article pages. In addition to [[Template:uw-talkinarticle|uw-talkinarticle]] found on the list, we also have the uw-cia series ([[Template:uw-cia1|1]] [[Template:uw-cia2|2]] [[Template:uw-cia3|3]] [[Template:uw-cia4|4]]) of templates. The only reference I can find to these is [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject user warnings/Archives/2007/01#How about this|a talk page archive from 2007]]. Shouldn't we decide on one or the other and delete what we don't decide on? --[[Special:Contributions/71.199.125.210|71.199.125.210]] ([[User talk:71.199.125.210|talk]]) 00:14, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
| |||