Revision as of 00:52, 6 June 2006 edit Light current (talk \| contribs) 30,368 edits →Policy wording: A threat? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:57, 6 June 2006 edit undo Light current (talk \| contribs) 30,368 edits →Dictionary definitions: None taken! Next edit →
Line 378: :Please don't take offense. Given your points as raised and defended, I have two choices. The [[WP:AGF]] option is that you are well-meaning, but have several wrong ideas about Standard English. I regret having to be blunt, but I saw no reasonable choice. Your semantic games are neither well-done nor constructive. [[User:Robert A West\|Robert A.West]] ([[User talk:Robert A West\|Talk]]) 03:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC) No offence taken! But perhaps my use of the English language is more developed than yours! Since we are in [[Humpty Dumpty]] land, I consider what I wrote to be fair! BTW I '''am''' well meaning: its just that people dont appreciate my subtleties. Pls see my user page to find out more about me 8-)--[[User:Light current\|Light current]] 00:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC) == Policy wording ==

Wikipedia talk:Verifiability: Difference between revisions