Content deleted Content added
Reply |
Stalwart111 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10:
::*Oh, I understand. Must have missed that explanation somewhere, but it makes sense to me. I'm not sure that merging would be a great idea, simply from the perspective that it might create a massive and unwieldy article, even with only short summaries of 43 sketches (many of which would need at least a couple of paragraphs, even when summarised). But I get where you're coming from and good on you for doing it this way rather than just unilaterally merging/redirecting. And thanks for the very quick reply! [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''<font color="green">111</font>''']] 06:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
:::*I don't think all of them will actually need to be placed into a list. Some of them "establish" notability with a few basic sources, while a number of others simply exist for the sake of existing. Summarizing the basics of the sketch rather than summarizing the exact "plot" of the sketch, and then focusing on their real world influence would likely save some space as well. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 07:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
::::*Of course, yeah, some. But even if we're (very) generous and assume that ''half'' would go in that scenario, summarising 22 articles to create a massive article with 22 level-2 sub-headings would still be a huge undertaking. That's probably still too big an article for me. I'd say the best bet would be to nominate those that ''might'' not be notable for deletion and see what you're left with. [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''<font color="green">111</font>''']] 08:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
| |||