Content deleted Content added
Reply |
Stalwart111 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12:
::::*Of course, yeah, some. But even if we're (very) generous and assume that ''half'' would go in that scenario, summarising 22 articles to create a massive article with 22 level-2 sub-headings would still be a huge undertaking. That's probably still too big an article for me. I'd say the best bet would be to nominate those that ''might'' not be notable for deletion and see what you're left with. [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''<font color="green">111</font>''']] 08:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
:::::*I was thinking about it, but then I looked at some of the past AfDs. There are a few that would probably be deleted without much trouble, but the majority are likely to be more affected by personal feelings than anything else. It would just be a bunch of no consensus closings with advice to start a merge discussion, so I've just decided to skip to that step. I'd hope that doing a few at a time would allow for more focused discussion and keep the article from instantly bloating up. I'll probably have to ask on a few project pages to actually get any opinions at this point. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 09:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
::::::*The problem is that a merge discussion then becomes a giant AFD for all of the articles in question, or at least the 4 you've listed. At least one of those would likely never be merged (let alone deleted) based on sources. It certainly wouldn't need to rely on ILIKEIT votes. [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''<font color="green">111</font>''']] 09:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
| |||