Revision as of 14:31, 14 September 2013 edit Marc van Leeuwen (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 2,666 edits →Unitarily triangulizable? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:41, 14 September 2013 edit undo Marc van Leeuwen (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 2,666 edits →Choose an eigenbasis Next edit →
Line 11: The theorem by Frobenius is not stated clearly in the text. Moreover, I presume this needs additional hypotheses: what if one of the matrix does not admit an eigenbasis (see [[Jordan form]])?--Fph 09:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fph\|Fph]] ([[User talk:Fph\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fph\|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :Right, and moreover the statement once corrected becomes a trivial consequence of simultaneous triangularizability. Since apparently nobody is reading this anyway, I'm being bold and will reduce the second paragraph to its bare core. == Unitarily triangulizable? ==

Talk:Commuting matrices: Difference between revisions