Talk:Comparison of relational database management systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Doctorgage (talk | contribs) →Percona Server: new section |
→Tidying up the Comparison: FEATURE TABLE USE OF NON-STD FOOTNOTES |
||
Line 179:
==Tidying up the Comparison==
To adhere to Wikipedia policy, this comparison needs to include entries that have an article, and not include lists of external links. See for example [[Wikipedia:WTAF]] and [[Wikipedia:External links]]. [[User:Greenman|Greenman]] ([[User talk:Greenman|talk]]) 12:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
FEATURE TABLE USE OF NON-STD FOOTNOTES
The Features table uses a confusing combination of standard (Wikipedia) footnotes and non-standard notes. I was going to add a web reference to the SQLite API, but edit PREVIEW the Wikipedia assigned footnote number was NOT the "NOTE" number at the bottom of the table.
BTW, the reference to the SQLite API is: http://sqlite.org/cintro.html
It wasn't strictly necessary for understanding to footnote the SQLite API (except to prevent it from being deleted), however the footnote glitch prevented me from listing GUI's that are specifically designed to work with SQLite, but that are only available at URLs other than sqlite.org.
GUIs for SQLite links:
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=ManagementTools
[[User:Jim.Callahan,Orlando|Jim.Callahan,Orlando]] ([[User talk:Jim.Callahan,Orlando|talk]]) 15:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Can someone show what 'Shadow' partitioning is? It is a heading in the '''Partitioning''' table, but only [[Firebird]] and [[InterBase]] support it. Since these have a common origin, this would seem to be a platform-specific term. 'Shadow partitioning' is not mentioned in the [[Partition_(database)|Partitioning]] article, and I have not come across it in any RDBMS platform I have used. I suggest deleting this column. [[Special:Contributions/80.194.100.111|80.194.100.111]] ([[User talk:80.194.100.111|talk]]) 16:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
| |||