Content deleted Content added
Line 46:
:::::And yet [[Android version history]] gets to do that. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 06:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
::::::Hi. I expected an [[Wikipedia:Other stuff exists|"Other stuff exist"]] discussion from anyone but you, dear ViperSnake. If anything, articles like Android version history sully your good work. But [[History of Firefox]] is a nice example of how things should be. Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 10:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Who are you to say how wikipedia should or shouldn't be? Or that you are not supposed to be able to locate a list of features?! Wikipedia is a place for information and sometimes it is very usefull to present information in a list, you find it all over wikipedia. For me you have deliberately damaged the changes part to Windows 8.1 [[User:user931|user931]] 20:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
:::::::History of Firefox is a good example of sorting features based on which update brought them. It follows the advice of [[WP:NOTCHANGELOG]] because it integrates the changes into the history section/sub-article instead of a features section/sub-article. - [[User:Josh the Nerd|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh the Nerd|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Josh_the_Nerd|contribs]]) 15:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
::I still fail to understand why we can't have a list of important new features, like many Windows service packs and platform updates do. And why remove any mention of Direct3D 11.2, DXGI 1.3 and WDDM 1.3 - does it really qualify as "change log"? --[[Special:Contributions/128.69.219.161|128.69.219.161]] ([[User talk:128.69.219.161|talk]]) 19:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
| |||