Content deleted Content added
Line 62:
:::::Hi. Thanks, drew, for responding to the first part. As for the second part, 95.25.193.108, I could equally argue that maybe you need to stop acting like a WikiCriminal that breaks the rules and actually supply a source. Being a cop is better than being a robber. But that wouldn't be my reason. The real reason is that I have previously been a victim of lying and so I have deep respect for sources. Frankly, if you are expecting others to do all the good things for you in Wikipedia, it is not going to happen. No pain, no gain. Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 01:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
::::::Not providing links for valid information is not criminal, officer. If you were a Wikipedia editor sufficiently knowledgeable in the matter, you would try to verify and correct them in the first place. --[[Special:Contributions/95.25.193.108|95.25.193.108]] ([[User talk:95.25.193.108|talk]]) 12:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Hi. [[WP:V|Contents without a source may be challenged and removed]]. Also, [[WP:BURDEN|the burden of source lies with the person who adds or reinstates the contents]]. Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 14:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
| |||