Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Major clean up: This article is silly |
||
Line 236:
::::::* I'm not opposed to examples (they aren't here anyway), it's just that I consider it incomplete. Well, I can see we won't agree on this subjective issue, so I won't bother with [[WP:OWNER|your page]] anymore... -- '''<font color="#199199">[[User:P199|P 1 9 9]]</font>''' • <small>[[User talk:P199|TALK]]</small> 22:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::::*So now you want to sink to snide bullshit like ownership accusations? Since you decided to toss AGF out the window......Look again sunshine. I wasn't the one who proposed it in the first place. And now you want to pretend like you're being reasonable? You haven't even entertained the suggestion that was made and agreed to by others about a using a few examples and a link to the rest. Where have you bothered to discuss it? It has been a "I want it all" proposition for you since the start. I've talked about a middle ground more than once. You have barely even acknowledged that. [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 23:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
An article on 10-codes, with a section called "List of ten-codes" should contain at least one 10-code. Otherwise... what are we doing here?? I have no idea what politics are going on with this page, but this is just silly. Just delete the article and be done with it.
==Nine code?==
| |||