Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactive application security testing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Comment |
|||
Line 13:
<hr style="width:55%;" />
* '''Delete''' and agree, Wikipedia articles on related subjects could use some work. It was created by a single-purpose account that also tried to create an article on a company mentioned in this one: [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quotium Technologies]], which would not disqualify it ''per se''. But this one has just too many issues with style being all out of place. Too many capital letters, no lead, raw urls for citations, dated language (" today’s date", "At this point of time", "at present" etc.) reads clearly like a marketing research report (e.g. [[solution]]s) not encyclopedia language. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 22:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - I agree the article has problem (I've added an {{t|essay-like}} tag) but we don't delete flawed articles, we improve them. The AfD question here is about [[WP:N|notability]] and no one has addressed that question yet. ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 15:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||