Revision as of 17:18, 9 October 2013 edit Spinningspark (talk \| contribs) 89,216 edits →Nock (programming language): reply to Walter ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:32, 9 October 2013 edit undo Walter Görlitz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 294,571 edits →Nock (programming language): sorr. you're wrong Next edit →
Line 9: * '''Delete''' - The article itself doesn't need to indicate notability, it's our job to determine if the subject is or isn't notable. After a brief search, I cannot find any sources to support its notability. In short, the article can't indicate the subject's notability in this case. [[User:Walter Görlitz\|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz\|talk]]) 20:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC) : @[[User:Walter Görlitz]], ''The article itself doesn't need to indicate notability''. Well yes it does. An article stating only that "George Washington was a good man" would be deletable whereas "George Washington was the first presisdent of the United States" would not. Walter, I expect you were implying that I did not follow [[WP:BEFORE]] to check if the subject is notable. Well yes I did and no it's not. '''[[User:Spinningspark\|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark\|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark'''</font>]]''' 17:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC) ::: Well no it doesn't. I'm sorry you don't understand that basic premise. The article can be about a subject that is notable but not explain it. We could delete it or we could improve it. [[User:Walter Görlitz\|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz\|talk]]) 17:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC) '''Delete''' - No coverage in reliable sources whatsoever. -- [[User:Whpq\|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq\|talk]]) 16:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Qwertyus\|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus\|hm?]])</small> 14:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nock (programming language): Difference between revisions