Content deleted Content added
class=C|importance=high for WPDATABASE |
No edit summary |
||
Line 63:
I found the below commented-out in the "External links" section. -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland|talk]]) 04:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
== Advertisement ==
Hi, I am rather new to Wikipedia. I hope I am not doing that wrong.
I think the following sentence is pure advertisement:
"With the introduction of NVDIMM technology,[6] in-memory databases will now be able to run at full speed and maintain data in the event of power failure."
First, there are several competitors for NVM, but one calls it NVDIMM, which is by accident also referenced (i.e.g, Viking). Second, the sentence is not correct. Large vendors as Oracle, MS, and SAP are currently looking into NVM, but no one expects results the next two years since "real NVM" (not RAM with a battery) is not expected in mass production before 2014/15.
If you need more information just ask Prof. Pavlo of Carnegie-Mellon, he's working on NVM techniques for in-memory databases.
----
| |||