Content deleted Content added
Fsixtyfour (talk | contribs) |
Fsixtyfour (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 43:
The major drawback to static image acquisition is that it is time consuming, both in sample preparation (getting the sample onto the slide with proper dilution if necessary), and in multiple movements of the stage in order to be able to acquire a statistically significant number of particles to count/measure. Computer-controlled X-Y positioning stages are sometimes used in these systems to speed the process up and to reduce the amount of operator intervention, but it is still a time consuming process, and the motorized stages can be expensive due to the level of precision required when working at high magnification.
The major advantages to static particle imaging systems are the use of standard microscope systems and simplicity of [[depth of field]] considerations. Since these systems can be made from any standard optical microscope, they may be a lower cost approach for people who already have microscopes. More important, though, is that microscope-based systems have less depth of field issues generally versus dynamic imaging systems. This is because the sample is placed on a microscope slide, and then usually covered with a [[cover slip]], thus limiting the plane containing the particles relative to the [[optical axis]]. This means that more particles will be in acceptable focus at high magnifications.
===Dynamic Image Acquisition:===
| |||