Content deleted Content added
per wp:talk chronological order of discussion |
|||
Line 22:
:::::I'm afraid you should first read [[wp:what wikipedia is]]. First of all, the version you want to be removed was a concesus version between Greek&Albanian editors. To sum up, your proposal appears to be entirely problematic:
#Useless info about legal procedures, entirely cited by primary sources (this ''is'' irrelevant with this article indeed).
#:I got the explanation from the Ministry's web site, your conclusion come from what you think that the law does, and it is nothing legally complicated there, it says the same thing but in a formal way. We are talking about a census law, not some teenager discussions.[[User:Mondiad|Mondiad]] ([[User talk:Mondiad|talk]]) 22:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)▼
#Poorly and povish written: the first conclusion after the decision is as follows: ''PDIU claimed the amendments as a victory over Greek chauvinism'' ... You cares about the personal povs of every side? This needs to be written in a neutral style and placed ''after'' a neutral description of the events.
#:PDIU claimed it as a a victory over chauvinism, that is true. There is a reference from their website. I did not say "I claim it", I said "PDIU claimed it", and that is totally true. Why are you surprised with that? The same as PBDNJ claims it the other way. There is nothing neutral or non-neutral here, just stating the both sides positioning.[[User:Mondiad|Mondiad]] ([[User talk:Mondiad|talk]]) 22:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)▼
#Neutral opinion by human rights organizations is completely absent.[[User:Alexikoua|Alexikoua]] ([[User talk:Alexikoua|talk]]) 14:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
▲#:I got the explanation from the Ministry's web site, your conclusion come from what you think that the law does, and it is nothing legally complicated there, it says the same thing but in a formal way. We are talking about a census law, not some teenager discussions.[[User:Mondiad|Mondiad]] ([[User talk:Mondiad|talk]]) 22:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
▲#:PDIU claimed it as a a victory over chauvinism, that is true. There is a reference from their website. I did not say "I claim it", I said "PDIU claimed it", and that is totally true. Why are you surprised with that? The same as PBDNJ claims it the other way. There is nothing neutral or non-neutral here, just stating the both sides positioning.[[User:Mondiad|Mondiad]] ([[User talk:Mondiad|talk]]) 22:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
#:And the fact that the Greek have been oppressed in Communism is based on Greek newspapers, can be 4, can be 14, it is the same point if view. You cannot mark it as default that they have been forced to change nationality, and based on that keep discussing about the PDIU law. That statement itself is more important and disputed than any law, or political party positioning. You cannot seal it up that "the Greeks have been oppressed" just with one sentence inside PDIU's article. Maye you can say that the Greek side claims (or PBDNJ claims) that "many people have lost their nationality during Communism". Then we would have a starting point for a consensus. But you cannot give it as an axiom like it was something so insignificant.[[User:Mondiad|Mondiad]] ([[User talk:Mondiad|talk]]) 22:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||