Content deleted Content added
Quentin.Ncs (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Quentin.Ncs (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8:
Second, the current section entirely lacks considerations of different dynamics that drive globalization. For example, the section fails to analyze a perspective of gender and development in concepts of human capital, labor, capital, and trade. Particularly, the failure is evident in that the entry omits an examination of the impact of financial crises in gender and development.[8] Whilst financial crises became a norm rather than exception in an increasingly liberalized global economy, any attempt to explain gender and development without considering these monumental phenomena discredits its validity and invites us to make a serious revision.
Third, the current section fails to present a balanced mix of empirical evidence, policy analyses and linkage to other related concepts. Therefore, in creating new subsections Human Capital, Labor, Capital, and Trade, each of subsection will begin with a brief overview of statistics and empirical evidence. Then the argument moves on to an analysis of related policies. Finally, each subsection is to be completed by presenting inter-linkages. To illustrate, a subsection of human capital summarizes empirical evidence concerning education, health, and demography that are important indicators of human and economic development. Educational and health policies are analyzed to add practical dimension to the analysis. In the end, we will add brief explanations of inter-linkage, such as correlation between female educational achievements and quality of labor force.
|