Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadow (programming): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:56, 3 June 2006

Revision as of 04:21, 10 June 2006

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''Keep (No consensus)'''.I think 2 relists is enough to establish we do not have consensus one way or the other. --'''<font color="green">[[User:Lar/Esperanza|+]]</font>[[Special:Emailuser/Lar|+]]'''[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 04:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

===[[Meadow (programming)]]===

contested prod. Reasons provided ere "non notable software, vandalized for a month" -- <small> [[User talk:Drini|Drini]]</small> 04:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Line 17 ⟶ 24:

*'''Keep'''. It's not just a port. What Meadows achieves is to extend the capabilities of emacs to make it suitable for use in complicated linguistic environments, such as the [[Japanese writing system]], in which a literate user needs to be able to freely combine [[Kanji]] with two [[syllabary|syllabaries]]: [[Hiragana]] and [[Katakana]]. --[[User:Lambiam|Lambiam]][[User talk:Lambiam|<small>^Talk</small>]] 16:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' - Whether or not its useful doesn't matter in my opinion as far as WP-ness. However, there is no verifiable info/sources or any claims of the usage of such an application (eg. do a lot of people use it?). Not every piece of potentially useful software gets its own article. [[User:Wickethewok|Wickethewok]] 20:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>