Revision as of 16:05, 28 October 2013 edit JorgePeixoto (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,200 edits →This huge article needs to be pruned. In particular, the reception section. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:47, 28 October 2013 edit undo Ahunt (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 229,521 edits →Reliability of sources: reply Next edit →
Line 219: == Reliability of sources == Some of the sources are bad. I am studying Wikipedia policy on source reliability and evaluating each source in the Reception section. One source that already stands out is http://desktoplinuxreviews.com. The writer does seem to have professional writing experience (see http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/about/) but it still is a one-person blog with no Wikipedia article about it, a very low Alexa rank (322,029), and no hits in Google Scholar. -- [[User:JorgePeixoto\|Jorge]] ([[User talk:JorgePeixoto\|talk]]) 16:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC) :LinuxDesktopReviews is a self-published blog by Jim Lynch. The reason it is a [[WP:RS]] is because his reviews are also widely published in other publications, making him an established expert in the field as outlined at [[WP:SPS]]. - [[User:Ahunt\|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt\|talk]]) 16:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Unity (user interface): Difference between revisions