Content deleted Content added
JorgePeixoto (talk | contribs) |
JorgePeixoto (talk | contribs) →Next steps: new section |
||
Line 23:
:LinuxDesktopReviews is a self-published blog by Jim Lynch. The reason it is a [[WP:RS]] is because his reviews are also widely published in other publications, making him an established expert in the field as outlined at [[WP:SPS]]. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 16:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
:: Please see [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#http:.2F.2Fdesktoplinuxreviews.com_and_http:.2F.2Fwww.omgubuntu.co.uk]] -- [[User:JorgePeixoto|Jorge]] ([[User talk:JorgePeixoto|talk]]) 01:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
== Next steps ==
I think a [[Wikipedia:To-do_list|To-do_list]] is good to focus efforts. If you agree on making one, I have two suggestions for the Reception section:
# Find a better source (Slashdot is low-quality) for the claim that images are anonymized before being sent to the user's computer. See if reviewers have changed their minds. If so, reorganize the section to list first the current reception, and later the past controversy.
# Possibly read [https://perot.me/ubuntu-privacy-blunder-over-amazon-ads-continues] (which is notable because it was cited by [http://www.zdnet.com/canonical-performs-u-turn-over-amazon-search-results-in-ubuntu-12-10-7000004950/]) and maybe report it, if it is still relevant (I think the shopping lens has switched to HTTPS since that analysis) and has anything notable that is not covered by [https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/privacy-ubuntu-1210-amazon-ads-and-data-leaks]. -- [[User:JorgePeixoto|Jorge]] ([[User talk:JorgePeixoto|talk]]) 22:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||