Revision as of 10:16, 1 November 2013 edit Rp (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,953 edits →Language history and evolution -outright bias ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:17, 1 November 2013 edit undo Rp (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,953 edits m →Language history and evolution -outright bias Next edit →
Line 129: This section is terrible, and terribly unencylopedic. Java comes off as the George Orwell "Animal Farm" of computing, while C# sounds like the tyrant with operational efficiency. I think framing the historical perspective is very important, but it comes off so biased I think deleting it entirely would add to the article. An alternative would be to cut any post-2000 (the debut of C#) reference from the article. Would anyone be opposed to this? [[User:Evolvedmicrobe\|Evolvedmicrobe]] ([[User talk:Evolvedmicrobe\|talk]]) 04:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC) :I'm a little tired of seeing accusations of 'bias' here; as far as I can see, the Java section is just sloppy, and the claims made there can be substantiated with references or deleted. However it would be good to avoid creating complete version histories of both and refer to [[Java version history]], [[Java (software_platform)#History]], [[C Sharp (programming_language)#History]], and [[.NET Framework version history]] for details instead. [[User:Rp\|Rp]] ([[User talk:Rp\|talk]]) 10:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions