Revision as of 13:52, 21 August 2013 edit 2001:18e8:2:1020:202a:8dd6:6403:b77 (talk) →Motivation: Made this neutral, rather than assuming that everyone must accommodate the ideologues who know what's really good ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:07, 3 November 2013 edit undo Dark Mistress (talk \| contribs) 467 edits →Recommendation retracted: The of "free" MP3 reference is free, sans patents on it. Unclear context corrected. Next edit →
Line 96: In response to criticism, the [[WHATWG]] has cited concerns over the Ogg formats still being within patent lifetime and thus vulnerable to unknown patents.<ref>{{cite mailing list \|url= http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-December/013154.html \|title=Re: [whatwg] Removal of Ogg is preposterous \|date=11 December 2007 \|accessdate=2008-02-25 \|mailinglist=whatwg mailing list \|last=Hickson \|first=Ian}}</ref> Such [[submarine patent]]s may also exist for ~~non-free~~ formats like [[MP3]]. Also, the [[H.264/MPEG-4 AVC\|AVC]] patent licensing policy is subject to change in a not-yet-clear manner.<ref>{{cite news \|last=Paul \|first=Ryan \|title=Decoding the HTML 5 video codec debate \|work=Infinite Loop / The Apple Ecosystem \|date=2009-07-05 \|url=http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/07/decoding-the-html-5-video-codec-debate.ars \|accessdate=2012-07-25}}</ref> ==Adoption==

Ogg formats in HTML5: Difference between revisions