Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Keval tilva (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 34:
[[User:Andrea Trementozzi|Andrea Trementozzi]] ([[User talk:Andrea Trementozzi|talk]]) 21:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 1
*I agree you need to link to what a tensor is.
6. Responsive to comments: 1
Have not responded to comments on talk page from previous reviewer.
7. Formatting: 1
No course page banner
Figures are all placed on right hand side and do not line up with section of text they represent. Try to either move them into text or left side and directly reference them.
8. Writing: 1
*The writing style, using sentence openers like, "in fact", "likewise" seem colloquial and non encyclopedic. It appears more of a narrative of someone else's research.
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
* You have the history, an example, and an application, however you do not have a section looking at the actual mathematical model and basic principles of this theory. There is not model section or framework. If someone wanted to learn what it was and try to use it to solve a problem. This page would not have enough information.
_______________
Total: 15 out of 20
[[User:Keval tilva|Keval tilva]] ([[User talk:Keval tilva|talk]]) 17:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
|