Web query classification: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:10, 12 January 2013

Revision as of 10:44, 25 November 2013

Line 35:

Many queries are short and query terms are noisy. As an example, in the KDDCUP 2005 dataset, queries containing 3 words are most frequent (22%). Furthermore, 79% queries have no more than 4 words. A user query often has multiple meanings. For example, "''apple''" can mean a kind of fruit or a computer company. "''Java''" can mean a programming language or an island in Indonesia. In the KDDCUP 2005 dataset, most of the queries contain more than one meaning. Therefore, only using the keywords of the query to set up a [[vector space model]] for classification is not appropriate.

* Query-enrichment based methods<ref>Shen et al. [http://www.sigkdd.org/explorationssites/default/files/issues/7-2-2005-12/KDDCUP2005Report_Shen.pdf "Q2C@UST: Our Winning Solution to Query Classification"]. ''ACM SIGKDD Exploration, December 2005, Volume 7, Issue 2''.</ref><ref>Shen et al. [http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1165776 "Query Enrichment for Web-query Classification"]. ''ACM TOIS, Vol. 24, No. 3, July 2006''.</ref> start by enriching user queries to a collection of text documents through [[search engines]]. Thus, each query is represented by a pseudo-document which consists of the snippets of top ranked result pages retrieved by search engine. Subsequently, the text documents are classified into the target categories using synonym based classifier or statistical classifiers, such as [[Naive Bayes]] (NB) and [[Support Vector Machines]] (SVMs).

How about disadvantages and advantages??