Revision as of 12:52, 28 November 2013 edit MSGJ (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 135,092 edits →Protection detection: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:20, 29 November 2013 edit undo Mr. Stradivarius (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 59,228 edits →Protection detection: comment Next edit →
Line 11: ::::It's three tables now. Besides the long-established [[User:AnomieBOT/PERTable]] and [[User:AnomieBOT/SPERTable]], [[User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable]] was set up a few days ago. --[[User:Redrose64\|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64\|talk]]) 11:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC) :::::Yes, it was actually the PER and TPER tables that I was referring to (although it could apply to SPER as well.) I'm not seeing any advantages in having separate templates and separate categories for full- and template-protected pages. And in fact there are disadvantages because editors now have to choose between more templates and reviewers have to monitor more categories. So my proposal is to let the bot maintain the three tables but use a common template. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ\|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ\|talk]])</small> 12:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC) {{od\|6}} Your suggestion would definitely be easier for most editors to understand, and I have already seen a fair few mistakes with the new protection templates. We would have to rethink the way we layout the categories to make them easy to access for patrollers at all permissions levels, but that's not such a bad thing in my opinion. [[User:Anomie\|Anomie]], what do you think? — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius\|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius\|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 04:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Module talk:Protected edit request: Difference between revisions