Revision as of 20:29, 29 November 2013 edit Anomie (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators 34,792 edits →Protection detection: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:34, 2 December 2013 edit undo MSGJ (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 135,092 edits →Protection detection: re Next edit →
Line 15: :: I think Martin is suggesting that you reprogram the bot so that it chooses which table to put a page in depending on the protection level it detects. So all the pages would be in the same category, and the bot would do the work of sorting them into tables by protection level. It's completely up to you whether you want to go through with it, of course. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius\|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius\|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 17:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC) ::: Then where would the two tables be displayed? It would make more sense to me in that case to have one PER table but to color the template-protected rows differently (suggestions as to the coloring welcome). [[User:Anomie\|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie\|⚔]] 20:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC) ::::Yep, color coding would work as well. Having two separate tables and transcluding them both to the category might be slightly more flexible, because template editors might choose to tranclude it to their userpage or whatnot. I don't really mind, both would be an improvement on the current situation. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ\|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ\|talk]])</small> 12:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Module talk:Protected edit request: Difference between revisions