Content deleted Content added
StefenTower (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
GreenReaper (talk | contribs) One idea that came to me is that perhaps we should have a template that linked to families of programming language, with the actual languages linked on those articles. |
||
Line 22:
:::::If something has been deleted, it is generally not a good idea to try to resurrect it, unless perhaps all the problems discussed in the deletion process are resolved. — [[User:Stevietheman|<span style="color:white; background-color: green;"> '''Stevie is the man!''' </span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]]</sup> 17:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
:One idea that came to me is that perhaps we should have a template that linked to '''families''' of programming language, with the actual languages linked on those articles. It is ''usually'' easier to get people to agree on a classification of a language than it is to get them to agree on its notability, and things can always be in two lists if necessary. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] 18:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
|