Revision as of 17:07, 17 February 2006 edit 12.17.30.3 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:12, 13 June 2006 edit undo 212.146.55.217 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 23: :I think that semantics are very important in the discussion of confectionery. In order to have a base to understand the subject, we all have to be clear on the basic terms and what they mean. I am an American but I admire the British for taking their confectionery seriously. I don't think there can be a serious discussion on confectionery without laying the groundwork. --[[User:mallured\|mallured]] 02:27, 24 June 2005 (UTC) Wouldn't the easiest thing be to simply have two separate pages for two versions of english? I'm beginning to wonder whether Wikipedia ought to have regional variations for its english edition as there are for physical encyclopedias and dictionaries, with the local definition of a word first and global variations second. ----

Talk:Confectionery: Difference between revisions