Revision as of 05:24, 12 December 2013 edit Xemoi (talk \| contribs) 131 edits →Origin: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:29, 12 December 2013 edit undo Xemoi (talk \| contribs) 131 edits →Application: new section Next edit →
Line 356: The transition from "Origin" to "Application" in the text is too abrupt. How did the linguists of old really apply the method, by and large? And how has its application changed? The history part gives some clues, but very little.[[User:Xemoi\|Xemoi]] ([[User talk:Xemoi\|talk]]) 05:24, 12 December 2013 (UTC) == Application == As a follow up to the previous thread, the "Application" section fails to identify clearly what example or recommendation comes from which of the two refs supposedly offered as source. In fact, it seems like original synthesis, IMO.[[User:Xemoi\|Xemoi]] ([[User talk:Xemoi\|talk]])

Talk:Comparative method: Difference between revisions