Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Yoric~enwiki (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 56:
The single most important distinguishing feature between most "dynamic" languages and "non-dynamic" languages has to do with type systems (and not interactivity, or some other fuzzily defined concept which doesn't hold under careful examination), yet type systems are practically ignored in the article. [[User:70.36.30.117|70.36.30.117]] 06:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
----
I'm not sure about the dynamic typing part. I mean yes, every dynamic language I can think of is dynamically typed. But I believe that this absence of static or semi-static checks is a consequence of other features, rather than a feature/drawback by itself. [[User:Yoric|Yoric]] 14:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
----
* This delay can be dramatically reduced almost to zero in practice however, for instance, the Objective-C programming language used a pre-loaded cache and a small bit of assembler code in order to reduce this overhead to a single operation.
That's a claim I've often heard. I've never seen anything to back it. Does anyone have any clue ?
[[User:Yoric|Yoric]] 14:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
| |||