Revision as of 16:58, 14 June 2006 edit Yoric~enwiki (talk \| contribs) 91 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:03, 14 June 2006 edit undo Yoric~enwiki (talk \| contribs) 91 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 12: * Self-modifiable assembly language ? == Criteria == * Dynamic = interpreted ? * Dynamic = dynamically-typed ? Line 27: * Is there such a thing as '''a dynamic programming language''' or should we say that one ''implementation'' of a language is '''dynamic''' ? I would vote for the second option. After all, iirc, there's an interpreted version of C, with a toplevel and the possibility of adding or replacing functions at run-time. Still, it is the same language. === Interpretation === Lisp is dynamic. Lisp can be compiled. Is that a good-enough counter-example ? I must admit that I don't know enough about the internals of Lisp compilation. [[User:Yoric\|Yoric]] 16:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC) === Dynamic typing, type annotations === Could anyone give an example of a dynamic programming language which is not dynamically typed, or a dynamically typed programming language which is not dynamic? -- [[User:ciphergoth\|ciphergoth]] 20:05, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)

Talk:Dynamic programming language: Difference between revisions