Content deleted Content added
Line 73:
::KVM was written by [[Qumranet]], before [[Red hat]] acquired it. Because it is free software, part of the [[Linux kernel]], '''any''' company, not just [[Red hat]] can use it or modify it - so it is by no means proprietary. [[Red hat]] does have on its payroll all the influential KVM developers, so it has significant leverage on the direction that its development is taking, but nothing is preventing other companies from chipping in. In fact, yesterday, an alliance was formed by several companies (Redhat, IBM, HP, Intel, and others) that want to develop and promote KVM - see [http://www.openvirtualizationalliance.org/news/] [[User:Nyh|Nyh]] ([[User talk:Nyh|talk]]) 14:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
:Is information needed regarding the original author (inventor) of KVM in this article? Is that the question? Otherwise, bore others with your general questions. Does it need to be said that KVM is an open software solution for the linux kernel, another open software solution and is necessarily not proprietary (i.e. fascist, captialist, intellectual property trash)? Just ask the Free Software Foundation if they'll legally defend that statement, or read up on it, like in wikipedia.[[User:Kckid|Kckid]] ([[User talk:Kckid|talk]]) 22:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
== Disambiguation ==
| |||