Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terran computational calendar: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Science (FWDS) |
|||
Line 16:
:::Thank you. I apologise for posting in the [[Calendar_reform#13-month calendars|calendar reform article]]. I should have posted in the [[Talk:Calendar_reform#13 Month Calendar|calendar reform talk page]] before making any modifications (though I didn't understand or know of the existance of talk pages before now). I believe the terran computational calendar is an excellent alternative in conjunction with (not replacement for) the current [[ISO_8601]] standardized calendar and gregorian calendar and I believe that the article is not at all "a bad idea". This being said, I agree that this article is not inline with many wikipedia expectations, and therefore I'll withdraw my thoughts and questions on this matter over to [[Talk:Terran_computational_calendar|the terran computational calendar talk page]], [[User talk:Jc3s5h|Jc3s5h's talk page]], and maybe eventually the [[Talk:Calendar_reform#13 Month Calendar|calendar reform talk page]]. [[User:Chimeraha|Chimeraha]] ([[User talk:Chimeraha|talk]]) 06:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)</small>
|