Talk:Common Object Request Broker Architecture: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:24, 9 January 2014

Revision as of 20:26, 9 January 2014

Line 195:

As of now there is a lot of detail in the Overview section. Essentially most of the article are sub sections under Overview. I think it needs to be re-structured. E.g., make some of those sub-sections top level sections and/or create additional top level section(s) with a more reasonable title than "Overview" and group the sub-sections under them. I may take a shot at that but at a minimum I wanted to document I think it needs to be done. --[[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 16:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

:After looking a bit more one of the things that jumps out at me is that Features could definitely be it's own major heading and I think it should be called Benefits instead. The difference is subtle but to me a feature is some technical capability that the system has. aA benefit is something of value a user gets of value as a result of the feature. That list seems more like benefits (other things in the article are what I would consider features). I plan to change it unless anyone objects. --[[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 19:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

::I made the change. Also, changed some wording. There was an unsourced claim about how "no other system provides what CORBA provides" which I just removed. IMO those kinds of claims are more appropriate for vendor marketing materials then for an encyclopedia anyway. There was also a direct link to an external site which I removed and turned into a reference. --[[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 20:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)