Talk:Eiffel (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 41:
:: I guess that the x. is a typo, it has no mean in Eiffel syntax. Whereas x is a reference to an instance of a class that inherits from TRAVERSABLE[G] (in the eiffel base). [[User:Momet|Momet]] 16:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
::: That's clear for me now that "x." has no meaning. But said "inherits form class in the Eiffel Base" -- you restricted that example only for those implementations with Eiffel Base. IMHO, that are ISE Eiffel and Visual Eiffel.
:::Am I right in that? And SmartEiffel hasn't this class at all.
::::I think I made a mistake, it's not TRAVERSABLE in the EiffleBase (from ISE), I guess it has to inherit from LINEAR, but don't trust me... There is something very similar in SmartEiffel, and it is ITERATOR, see [http://smarteiffel.loria.fr/libraries/ITERATORat.ANY.html this documentation] for more informations [[User:Momet|Momet]]
 
== Reflective? ==