Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/4: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:57, 13 December 2013

Revision as of 14:45, 23 January 2014

Line 1:

–{{Help intro frame top}}

<!-- TABS -->

{{Help:Introduction to referencing/tabs|This=4}}

Line 9:

The word "source" in Wikipedia has three meanings: the work itself (for example, a document, article, paper, or book), the creator of the work (for example, the writer), and the publisher of the work (for example, Cambridge University Press). All three can affect reliability.

As a general rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing of a publication, the more reliable it is. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources. Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers. (<small>Be awareawareuihjhfyfuvwhufvhuvfhufhvuhfvuhufvhucdhucdhjcdhhjh djdnjhd jdh undo high judhcjhdcjhdcjhjd hjdh jnd in didn in din hid nih finding jd ind jnd indichjdhcidh jdh jdh did jdh I'd ihjhdcjhwcdihdhihidcjhdchjdcjhcdjhdcjhhjdchjdhjchdjhcjhdjhcjdhjchdjhcjhdjhjcdhihcidhichdid
that some news organisations and magazines host "blogs" on their websites. They may be reliable if they are written by the publisher's professional writers, but posts by readers should not be used as sources.</small>)

'''Self-published media''', where the author and publisher are the same, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs and tweets, are largely '''not''' acceptable as sources. However, if an author is an established expert with a previous record of third-party publications on a topic, their self-published work ''may'' be considered reliable for that topic, though third-party publications are still preferable.