Content deleted Content added
→References: reflist |
m →Closed operators: per WP:HYPHEN, sub-subsection 3, points 3,4,5, replaced: densely- → densely (2) using AWB |
||
Line 77:
== Closed operators ==
Many naturally occurring linear discontinuous operators occur are [[closed operator|closed]], a class of operators which share some of the features of continuous operators. It makes sense to ask the analogous question about whether all linear operators on a given space are closed. The [[closed graph theorem]] asserts that all everywhere-defined closed operators on a complete ___domain are continuous, so in the context of discontinuous closed operators, one must allow for operators which are not defined everywhere. Among operators which are not everywhere-defined, one can consider densely
Thus let <math>T</math> be a map <math>X\to Y</math> with ___domain <math>\operatorname{Dom}(T)</math>. The graph <math>\Gamma(T)</math> of an operator <math>T</math> which is not everywhere-defined will admit a distinct closure <math>\overline{\Gamma(T)}</math>. If the closure of the graph is itself the graph of some operator <math>\overline{T}</math>, <math>T</math> is called closable, and <math>\overline{T}</math> is called the closure of <math>T</math>.
So the right question to ask about linear operators that are densely
In fact, an example of a linear operator whose graph has closure ''all'' of ''X''×''Y'' can be given. Such an operator is not closable. Let ''X'' be the space of [[polynomial function]]s from [0,1] to '''R''' and ''Y'' the space of polynomial functions from [2,3] to '''R'''. They are subspaces of ''C''([0,1]) and ''C''([2,3]) respectively, and so normed spaces. Define an operator ''T'' which takes the polynomial function ''x'' ↦ ''p''(''x'') on [0,1] to the same function on [2,3]. As a consequence of the [[Stone–Weierstrass theorem]], the graph of this operator is dense in ''X''×''Y'', so this provides a sort of maximally discontinuous linear map (confer [[nowhere continuous function]]). Note that ''X'' is not complete here, as must be the case when there is such a constructible map.
|