Revision as of 19:09, 16 December 2013 edit Jarble (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 150,084 edits Linking to sources for fact-checking ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:55, 29 January 2014 edit undo Loadmaster (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,248 edits →C and C++: new section Next edit →
Line 152: What does "modularity" have to do with "stepwise refinement"? Modularity is all about abstraction and separation of concerns. A user of a module does not need to be concerned with its concrete implementation, so long as the module's structure matches its given signature. Of course, modular programming makes stepwise refinement easier by allowing programmers to handle the evolution of each module's internals independently, but even if this were not the case, stepwise refinement would be feasible. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Catnaroek\|Catnaroek]] ([[User talk:Catnaroek\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Catnaroek\|contribs]]) 15:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == C and C++ == While [[COBOL]] and [[Java (programming language)\|Java]] appear in the list of programming languages that support modules, I see that [[C (programming language)\|C]], [[C++]], and [[C Sharp (programming language)\|C#]] are noticeably absent. Is this just an oversight? — [[User:Loadmaster\|Loadmaster]] ([[User talk:Loadmaster\|talk]]) 22:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Modular programming: Difference between revisions