Content deleted Content added
m Dating comment by MvH - "→Article needs improvement: " |
|||
Line 2:
This is just to say that a lot of work seems to be necessary here. Lots of stuff with little rhyme or reason, like the sectioning of the article; the subsection called "example" is hard to decipher, one wonders what this is an example of. [[User:Marc van Leeuwen|Marc van Leeuwen]] ([[User talk:Marc van Leeuwen|talk]]) 14:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
:The article lacks a clear purpose. Cantor-Zassenhaus is given here even though it has its own wiki page, while recent algorithms with subquadratric complexity are not even mentioned. I propose deleting large portions, and reduce the article to a list of references to other places.[[User:MvH|MvH]]. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 02:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Needs more Mathematical Methods and less computer algorithms ==
|