Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-object programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 3:
*If this were a notable programming method, one would expect a fair amount of google hits (since it is related to computers). But [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22post-object+programming%22&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official this isn't the case]. Thus, I must say, '''delete'''. -- [[User:Where|<b><font color="blue">Where</font></b>]] 00:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Expand''' or '''delete'''. I think it might be a valid article except that no references have been given for the article. Unless sources can be given, '''delete'''. - [[User:DNewhall|DNewhall]] 01:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': I repeated my search for references (with google: [http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22post-object+programming%22+-%22is+a+new+generation%22+-%22aspect-oriented+programming%22&
::[http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/cnc/mscprojects/index_2003.html#cnc.t3 Post-Object Programming for Computational Science], which says a little and gives 2 emails to ask for further details
::[http://www.swcp.com/raccoon/postobject.html Post-object programming], which lists our WP article as one of 2 web references (the other one being the Cecil's homepage).
|