Revision as of 03:30, 15 February 2014 edit 173.73.92.75 (talk) Suggested [citation needed] and/or wording cleanup for lookup table decoding ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:31, 15 February 2014 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,740 edits m Signing comment by 173.73.92.75 - "Suggested [citation needed] and/or wording cleanup for lookup table decoding" Next edit →
Line 85: This section states that decoding an LDPC code is NP-complete. Well, this is certainly not true for a [[binary erasure channel]], and ironically the example given discusses just that channel. Does the subsection on lookup-table decoding need a citation? Or does anyone know of some elaboration on the method described? I'm not sure how a 1024-bit table would help decode an LDPC with a 1024-bit block size. (I may be misreading that section; it could probably be cleaned up anyway; e.g. "very high iterations" could be "many iterations" or some more fluent wording.) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/173.73.92.75\|173.73.92.75]] ([[User talk:173.73.92.75\|talk]]) 03:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> === Other things ===

Talk:Low-density parity-check code: Difference between revisions