Content deleted Content added
Line 78:
*I agree that these articles can be merged, with Automaticity being the title, since procedural memory generally deals with automatic behavior. [[User:Lord Arador|Lord Arador]] ([[User talk:Lord Arador|talk]]) 03:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' - The two lemmas refer to rather distinct phenomena.
[[Special:Contributions/193.197.171.98|193.197.171.98]] --[[Special:Contributions/139.133.28.2|139.133.28.2]] ([[User talk:139.133.28.2|talk]]) 12:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)([[User talk:193.197.171.98|talk]]) 08:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
*I am '''opposed''' to this, it is true that some procedural processes could be considered automatic, e.g. motor sequences for bike riding. However there are other processes, characterised as automatic, that do not come under the name of procedural, such as stereotype activation and other social cognitive processes. Automaticity is a subject in its own right - and has been a common theme in psychology since its inception, (William James' 1890 unconscious mind).[[Special:Contributions/139.133.28.2|139.133.28.2]] ([[User talk:139.133.28.2|talk]]) 12:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
=Major revert needed?=
| |||