Content deleted Content added
Airvine1991 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 79:
* '''Oppose''' - The two lemmas refer to rather distinct phenomena.
[[Special:Contributions/193.197.171.98|193.197.171.98]] --[[Special:Contributions/139.133.28.2|139.133.28.2]] ([[User talk:139.133.28.2|talk]]) 12:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)([[User talk:193.197.171.98|talk]]) 08:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
*I am '''opposed''' to this, it is true that some procedural processes could be considered automatic, e.g. motor sequences for bike riding. However there are other processes, characterised as automatic, that do not come under the name of procedural, such as stereotype activation and other social cognitive processes. Automaticity is a subject in its own right - and has been a common theme in psychology since its inception, (William James' 1890 unconscious mind).--[[
=Major revert needed?=
| |||