Edoderoo

Versione delle 16:53, 23 giu 2013

Versione delle 22:31, 23 giu 2013

Riga 31:

:That's fine. I just wanted to make clear what are the consequences of any decision made. I would not favour a general wikidata preference on all articles. On some areas it's not clear where WikiData got their data from. For a tennis player, however, the source is anyways the ATP/WTA website. Maybe the Italian tennis-community should do some advertising on WikiData on tennis bio's only. [[Utente:Edoderoo|Edoderoo]] ([[Discussioni utente:Edoderoo|msg]]) 16:45, 23 giu 2013 (CEST)

::I've advertised this discussion [[Discussioni progetto:Sport/Tennis#Discussioni utente:Edoderoo#Templates and Wikidata|on the Tennis project]]. Thanks, --<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[Utente:Ricordisamoa|<span style="color:#004B70">Ricordi</span>]][[Discussioni utente:Ricordisamoa|<span style="color:#00703E">samoa</span>]]</span> 16:53, 23 giu 2013 (CEST)

As Ricordisamoa said, we prefer not to give priority to wikidata (discussion is [[Progetto:Coordinamento/Wikidata/Fase 2|here]]); a bot can remove the local values when we are sure wikidata is better.

The tennis infobox shows many informations taken in a certain date, including the date itself. Showing a win/lose ratio from a different and unknown date, even if more recent, may not be a great idea --[[Utente:Bultro|Bultro]] ([[Discussioni utente:Bultro|m]]) 22:31, 23 giu 2013 (CEST)